General Display |
![]() |
Schools & Instruction |
![]() |
Legal Services |
![]() |
Legal Notices |
![]() |
Classifieds |
![]() |
Salute to Civil Service Organization Month |
|
|||||
|
Nassau COs Stymied
To fully understand our need for binding arbitration, one must understand the bargaining history between Correction Officers and the County of Nassau. In August of 2000, the Sheriff Officers' Association negotiated a fair deal with then-County Executive Thomas Gulotta, only to have it rejected by the County Legislature. One year later, in August of 2001, after being without a contract for almost four years, the Legislature finally approved a contract. Upon the expiration of that contract, in September of 2005 the Sheriff Officers' Association negotiated a fair deal in good faith with the Suozzi administration, only to have it rejected by the Legislature. To our knowledge, in the history of contract negotiations in Nassau County, no other union has ever had a contract rejected by the Legislature. This has now happened to Correction Officers twice. Police and corrections unions from New York City, New York State, Westchester, Rockland and Suffolk counties have all been granted the option of using binding arbitration to resolve their contract disputes. Our organization is the only law-enforcement bargaining unit in the region that does not have this option. Our union is simply seeking binding arbitration as means of contract dispute resolution. While the Suozzi administration and the Sheriff Officers' Association will continue to disagree on important issues, we believe the time has come to establish a procedure to resolve these contract disputes without unnecessary rancor. Nassau County Correction Officers perform the toughest job in law enforcement. They deserve to be treated fairly, and they have earned the right to binding arbitration in order to secure a fair contract.
JOHN DUER, President, ShOA | |||||