Court Overturns Medicare B Hit On State
Staff; Decides Pataki's View Of Law Is Improper; $26M Refund Due
By GINGER ADAMS OTIS
Governor Pataki's attempt to make state employees pay
for premiums related to Medicare Part B was foiled by a recent Appellate
Division ruling that deemed the change illegal.
 |
| DANNY DONOHUE:
A big win for workers.
| |
The Pataki
administration last year implemented a new policy that forced active and retired
state employees to contribute more than $26 million a year for the Part B
health-care premiums - costs that previously had been paid by the state.
CSEA Wins Appeal
The Civil Service Employees' Association challenged the Pataki administration
in court and lost. The union, which represents 85,000 state employees,
immediately appealed the lower-court ruling, which was overturned in November by
the Appellate panel.
CSEA President Daniel Donohue applauded the result.
"As we saw it, the Pataki administration was taking money that wasn't theirs
to take, harming CSEA members and many others," he said in a written statement.
"We are pleased the court agreed with our assessment."
Calls to Governor Pataki's press office weren't returned by the time this
paper went to press, but CSEA spokesman Stephen Madarasz contended it was
unlikely that the case would be taken to the Court of Appeals.
 |
| GOVERNOR
PATAKI: Leaves on a losing note.
| |
"Given the timing
of things, with a new administration coming in, we are hopeful that it won't go
any further," he commented.
CSEA and a number of other unions sued last January when the Pataki
administration chose to reinterpret a long-standing civil service law and began
charging employees and retirees directly for the Medicare Part B premiums for
the first time in the 40-year history of the program.
CSEA claimed the state's action was in violation of regulations requiring
employers to pay 100 percent of the cost of Medicare Part B premiums. Nothing in
the law, rules or regulations allowed the state or other public employers to
pass on the costs to employees or retirees, the union charged.
The State Comptroller's Office issued an opinion supporting CSEA's position.
But an Albany County Supreme Court dismissed the union's case last March.
An Arbitrary Change
In reversing that ruling, the Appellate Division Justices found the Pataki
administration's new interpretation "arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law."
The court ruled the new policy was inconsistent with New York's legislative
history, as well as the state's "correct" 40-year interpretation of the law.
As part of the ruling, the state will have to reimburse the public employees
who were forced over the past year to contribute hundreds of dollars toward Part
B premiums.
Public employees have contributed approximately $26 million since last Jan.
1, Mr. Madarasz said.