Jockey
for Ballot Move-Up
For WFP, a Race Within
Race
By reuven blau
For Working Families Party Deputy Director Bill Lipton,
the highlight of Election Day Nov. 7 came when a woman randomly approached him
as he was moving boxes of campaign flyers into a waiting van.
 |
|
The Chief-Leader/Adrienne
Haywood-James
POINTING THE WAY: Working
Families Party Deputy Director Bill Lipton (right) gives tips to two
volunteers on how to persuade people to use the party's line to cast
their votes for Eliot Spitzer. He spent most of Election Day
deploying union members to key election sites.
| |
"I got mail
from Dick Gottfried, an e-mail from Gloria Steinem, and everyone in my union at
Mt. Sinai Hospital is voting for you guys," exclaimed Muriel Verman, referring
to messages from the State Assemblyman and the author/activist urging her to
vote on the WFP line. "Everyone I know is voting for you."
Made His Day
Mr. Lipton, who has spent much of the past year reaching out to union members
and likely voters on behalf of the small-but-growing grass-roots party, stopped
in his tracks. He put down the two boxes, thanked Ms. Verman for her support,
and then suddenly moved in for a hug. "This is like the best moment of my life,"
he said after she walked away.
In the van, Mr. Lipton repeated what had just happened to other party
officials on his cell phone. "I love it," he exclaimed. "Our goal is to have
people contacted in various ways. That woman was awesome. I just hope she was
right."
Mr. Lipton and hundreds of other party supporters began their day before
sunrise. "I actually got more sleep then I usually do before an Election Day,"
he said. "I went to bed at one and got up at four."
Volunteers from the WFP, which was created in 1998 by a group of labor and
community organizations, spent the entire day trying to persuade people to vote
for gubernatorial front-runner Eliot Spitzer on its line. Under New York State
law, third parties are allowed to cross-endorse major-party candidates.
Art of the Spiel
Hundreds of union members and other volunteers met in Chelsea at
Communications Workers of America Local 1101's offices, where Mr. Lipton
supplied them with campaign fliers and gave them quick lessons in how to
approach people on their way to vote.
"Okay, I'm the voter walking by," he said, as he lowered his head and picked
up his pace. Playing along, one of the volunteers walked beside him while
politely suggesting he vote for "Spitzer on Row E for more education funds and
for better health care."
Got Message Out
Mr. Lipton responded encouragingly. "All it takes is to just mention some
basic stuff to get their attention," he remarked. "But sometimes there will be
people who just want to rush in and vote."
With his glasses perched on the tip of his nose, Mr. Lipton repeated that
routine throughout the day before dispatching new volunteers. "It's important
they know how to approach voters," he commented.
In a sign that its economic justice message resonated with many Democratic
voters in the metropolitan region, the WFP picked up nearly 70,186 votes in the
city on its ballot line for Mr. Spitzer. According to preliminary results, the
WFP received a total of 126,796 votes statewide.
Fell Just Short
But that figure may not be enough to vault the expanding group past the
Conservative Party, which received 128,087 votes, according to initial returns.
The WFP was hoping to move up on the ballot from Row E to Row D.
Mr. Lipton and other party officials noted they will likely gain a
substantial number of votes after absentee and other mail-in ballots are
tallied. "We won't know for sure for about 25 days," he said during a phone
interview the day after last week's vote. "We are on pins and needles."
Low turnout hurt the party's chances of reaching its goal of obtaining
200,000 votes, he added. In all, approximately 4.1 million people voted last
week, down from 4.7 million in 2002. "We had thought he was going to get 70
percent of five million," Mr. Lipton remarked. "It's a much smaller pie. Our
modeling was a bit off."
'Still Growing'
He stressed, however, that the WFP officials were generally "ecstatic" about
the city figures, which showed that the group is the only minor political party
gaining votes.
"We are steadily climbing," he said. "We have momentum. We don't feel like
we're small anymore; we're the growing Working Families Party."
In contrast, the Independence Party - which four years ago had Governor
Pataki on its line - lost more than 500,000 votes last week from the 654,016 the
party got in 2002. Also, the Conservative party dropped from 176,848 votes in
last election to 128,087 in the latest vote.
The WFP once again plans to use its greater leverage to push harder for
living-wage measures, affordable health care, child care and housing, better
Workers' Compensation and unemployment benefits, and increased funding for
education.
With the help of other advocacy groups, the party has already successfully
lobbied the State Legislature to increase the minimum wage to $6 per hour as of
Jan. 1, 2005. It will go to $6.75 per hour the following January and rise to
$7.15 the next year.
More Unions Signing On
With each passing election, the WFP has also expanded its operational
capacity. Since 1998, the staff has gone from five full-time workers to nearly
30. "In the months before the election we had another 70 people," Mr. Lipton
said.
The number of affiliated unions - and volunteers they bring with them - has
also climbed. The WFP's founding unions were Communications Workers of America
District 1, the Buffalo Teachers' Federation, two United Auto Workers locals,
the Amalgamated Transit Union, and a handful of private-sector Teamsters locals.
In the intervening years, the party has bulked up with behemoths such as the
Service Employees' International Union, Transport Workers' Union Local 100 and
UNITE. Social Service Employees Union Local 371 of District Council 37 has also
become a key player.
The added leverage and political involvement led the party to make some
difficult decisions in local elections. The group's most controversial move was
its decision to stay neutral in the State Senate race in Westchester between
incumbent Republican Nicholas A. Spano and the eventual winner, Democrat Andrea
Stewart-Cousins.
Put Him Over Top in '04
In 2004, the WFP endorsed Mr. Spano, who won 1,870 votes on its line. That
support was crucial to his defeating Ms. Stewart-Cousins by just 18 votes. "We
were the margin of victory for Spano," one WFP official asserted. "It was a real
sign of our power."
Last week's vote was not nearly as close. Based on preliminary returns, Ms.
Stewart-Cousins defeated Mr. Spano by 2,145 votes.
Her victory came despite Mr. Spano's strong labor support. He was endorsed by
both the State AFL-CIO and Local 1199, which both tend to lean Democratic.
Sources indicated last week that the WFP's decision to stay out of the race
rather than back Ms. Stewart-Cousins was closely tied to Senate Majority Leader
Joseph L. Bruno's promise to help override Governor Pataki's veto of a bill
designed to provide thousands of day care workers a right to join a union.
Last month, the UFT kicked off a drive to have 10,000 home day-care providers
sign authorization cards as part of the effort to unionize the city's 32,000
workers.
But in addition to the signatures, the UFT needs legislation from Albany to
become the formal representatives of the providers. After the necessary bill
passed both the Assembly and Senate by wide margins, Mr. Pataki vetoed it
earlier this year. The Senate then voted to override, but no vote has been held
in the Assembly yet.
'We Owed Bruno'
A WFP official defended the group's decision to stay out of the race. "In
that instance, Bruno delivered something important to working people," one WFP
official said. "By treating these people like professionals and getting them
into the UFT, it is going to transform early childhood education."
In a sign of just how far the party has come from the last statewide
election, Mr. Spitzer actually recorded a robo-call telephone voice message on
behalf of the WFP. The automated calls and campaign e-mails went out to a list
of about 160,000 voters. In contrast, in 2002 the party complained that
Democratic candidate Carl McCall failed to coordinate his efforts in the race
with the group. Mr. Lipton noted that candidates can benefit greatly from also
running on the WFP's line.
"We have an infrastructure of strong staff that knows how to run campaigns,
and also because of the broad coalition that comprises the party," he said. "We
have the know-how with the staff and we have a broad base. That's a pretty
potent combination."
After polls closed, WFP staff and volunteers gathered in the friendly
environs of the Reboot Restaurant on the Lower East Side to watch the returns.
As the night progressed, it appeared as if the party had obtained the necessary
votes to move ahead of the Conservative party, which was greeted with chants of:
"Row D! Row D! Row D!"
At the bar eating pizza, Mr. Lipton said he wasn't tired despite the late
hour. "How can I be with these results?" he asked, as two blurry television
screens in the restaurant ran news of the latest tallies.
But WFP Executive Director Dan Cantor appeared more reserved, pacing in and
out of the eatery. He fiddled with his phone and several times asked aides
around him if they had any updates on the latest counts.
Back inside, he took particular interest in the Westchester Senate race,
pointing to the TV screen and waving his fist after it showed Ms.
Stewart-Cousins leading Mr. Spano.
With a glass of beer in hand, WFP co-chair Bob Master reveled in the victory
from the sidewalk, even as it began to drizzle. Gaining votes on its line was
more significant this time, he noted, because the state's other major Democratic
candidates were also far ahead. "For a change, we're not an island of victory in
a sea of misery," he said. "We're a surfer riding the wave of triumph."
'A Good Night for WFP'
At a quarter to midnight, Mr. Cantor got on a chair to address the largely
young and enthusiastic crowd. "It's been a very good night for America and it
looks like a very good night for the Working Families Party," he said, adding
that the final tally was still unknown.
He once again recalled that it was the same spot in 1998 where he stood to
tell supporters of the fledgling political movement that it had failed in its
efforts to get the 50,000 votes necessary to automatically be placed on the
ballot next election. (It was not until several days later that party officials
discovered that a recount and absentee ballots put it over the edge.)
But times had certainly changed. "Everyone gets a share of this one," Mr.
Cantor told the faithful last week. "We love to win these elections."