Spitzer Poised To Win Vote For Governor;
Major Change From Pataki on Schools, TWU Contract
By RICHARD STEIER
As this newspaper
appeared on the stands Nov. 7, New Yorkers were going to the polls to elect
their first new Governor in a dozen years, with the likelihood that the
Democratic nominee, State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, would be chosen to
succeed George E. Pataki in January.
 |
| ELIOT SPITZER:
On verge of moving up.
| |
Voters were also
choosing between Republican Jeanine Pirro and Democrat Andrew Cuomo to fill Mr.
Spitzer's current job, and deciding whether State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi's
use of a state worker to chauffeur his wife was a serious enough ethical
violation to turn him out of office in favor of his little-known Republican
opponent, former Saratoga County Treasurer Christopher Callaghan.
Removal 'Premature'
A special counsel chosen by Governor Pataki to examine Mr. Hevesi's conduct
concluded Nov. 3 that were was "a valid legal basis" for recommending to the
State Senate that it launch proceedings to remove the State Comptroller from
office. The counsel, former U.S. Attorney David N. Kelley, stopped short,
however, of advising Mr. Pataki to pursue that course, saying that it was
"premature" to do so.
 |
| DENIS M.
HUGHES: Aids Republican Senator.
| |
First, Mr. Kelley
said, it would have to be determined whether testimony before the State Ethics
Commission - whose report finding Mr. Hevesi acted improperly was the basis for
his own appointment to examine the matter - could be used as evidence in the
removal proceeding. A decision would also have to be made as to whether the
standard for determining removal would be finding Mr. Hevesi guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt or - as is the burden in civil trials - guilty based on the
preponderance of evidence.
$90,000 Additional Hit
He shared the Ethics Commission's conclusion that there was no need, based on
security issues, for a driver to be assigned to Mr. Hevesi's ailing wife at
state expense and that the Comptroller had tried to conceal his use of state
resources by making no attempt to keep records of how much time his aide spent
on those driving duties.
Mr. Hevesi last week paid $90,000 - in addition to more than $82,000 he had
already submitted in reimbursement - when the State Attorney General's Office
found he had underestimated the time the driver, Nicholas Acquafredda, devoted
to chauffeuring his wife.
State Senate Battle
The uproar over Mr. Hevesi's conduct, in fact, in recent weeks had
overshadowed both the Governor's race and the battle over whether Republicans
could maintain their majority in the State Senate. The GOP has a 35 to 27 edge
over Democrats in the upper legislative body, but was concerned that the large
margin Mr. Spitzer is expected to roll up against Republican nominee John Faso
could have an impact on some close Senate races.
Mr. Spitzer, who as Attorney General has gained a national reputation for his
crackdown on abuses on Wall Street, easily dispatched Nassau County Executive
Thomas R. Suozzi in the Democratic primary for Governor and has held public
opinion-poll leads of 50 points or more over Mr. Faso for months. His election
has become such a foregone conclusion that the only time the contest stirred a
ripple was when Mr. Faso upbraided him for not calling for Mr. Hevesi's
resignation, and Mr. Spitzer responded by rescinding his endorsement of the
State Comptroller - a former close ally - two weeks ago.
Hevesi's Lead Shrinking
The fallout from the Ethics Commission report sliced sharply into what had
once been a 40-point lead for Mr. Hevesi over Mr. Callaghan, and by the end of
last week the Comptroller, despite a blitz of TV advertising, to try to stop the
bleeding, saw it shrink to just four points in a Siena College poll.
The favorable recognition Mr. Spitzer has garnered among the public made him
so formidable a candidate that Mr. Faso has had trouble raising money. Early in
the campaign, when former Massachusetts Governor William Weld was the Republican
front-runner, ex-U.S. Sen. Alfonse M. D'Amato, currently a lobbyist but still a
power in the state Republican Party, heaped effusive praise on Mr. Spitzer. It
was viewed then as a shot at Mr. Weld, with whom he clashed more than a decade
earlier.
Mutual Non-Aggression
Mr. D'Amato's kind words about Mr. Spitzer continued even after Mr. Faso -
with whom he has no personal quarrel and is closer ideologically - won his
party's nomination. At the same time, state Democrats have not been as
aggressive as might have been expected in trying to win control of the Senate,
which would give their party control of both the executive and legislative
branches, since the Assembly is already heavily Democratic.
One tipoff of how the political winds are blowing may have come during the
summer when both the State AFL-CIO and Local 1199 of the Service Employees'
International Union became involved in trying to re-elect Westchester State Sen.
Nicholas Spano. Mr. Spano barely retained his seat two years ago, winning by
just 18 votes over Democratic challenger Andrea Stewart-Cousins.
A Favor to Bruno?
The State AFL-CIO and Local 1199 both tend to lean Democratic, and have been
staunch backers of Mr. Spitzer, but they have also had friendly relations with
Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno, who targeted Mr. Spano's race as among
the must-win contests to retain Republican control of the Senate.
State AFL-CIO President Denis M. Hughes last week said union volunteers would
be heavily involved in getting out the vote on Election Day for Mr. Spano, whom
he said had a stellar record on labor issues. In a statement issued by Mr.
Hughes, Civil Service Employees' Association President Danny Donohue and New
York State United Teachers Executive Vice President Alan Lubin also praised the
Westchester Senator.
The issues separating Mr. Spitzer and Mr. Faso have gotten relatively short
shrift because of the one-sidedness of the campaign. In several key respects,
Mr. Spitzer's positions and Mr. Faso's offer a sharp contrast from the
standpoint of public employees and their unions.
Although Mr. Spitzer, as the state's top attorney, has represented Governor
Pataki in repeatedly appealing rulings against him in the Campaign for Fiscal
Equity lawsuit, he has made clear that if elected he will look to resolve the
matter by giving city public schools substantially more money - while also
boosting education funding throughout the state.
Faso Demurs
Mr. Faso has indicated he would allocate far less money than a
court-appointed panel recommended to give the city public schools a fairer share
of state aid, and has asserted that Mr. Spitzer's plan would require a sizable
tax increase to fund it.
The former Assembly Minority Leader has also called for giving future public
employees 401(k) plans rather than traditional pensions, something that would
save money for the state and local governments but would reduce the retirement
allowances for those workers. Mr. Callaghan also supports such a move, which Mr.
Hevesi has likened to President Bush's aborted attempt to privatize Social
Security.
And where Mr. Pataki has often been criticized for indulging in "government
by contribution," making appointments and awarding state contracts to past
campaign backers, Mr. Spitzer has made reforming the overall culture in Albany a
centerpiece of his campaign. His walking away from his endorsement of Mr. Hevesi
was viewed as a signal that his calls for change will be more than election
rhetoric. Mr. Faso, however, has said Mr. Spitzer is too close to union leaders
and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver to make good on his pledge.
Caution Among Unions
Several union leaders have cautioned against regarding Mr. Spitzer as a
friend of labor, saying it is too early to tell whether this particular Democrat
will be more sympathetic to their needs and interests than Mr. Pataki has been.
One union that has no doubt the change can only be for the better, however,
is Transport Workers' Union Local 100. Union President Roger Toussaint has
charged that Mr. Pataki's determination to buttress his credentials among
national Republicans as he tried to launch a run for President figured
prominently in the hard line taken by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
last year before the union held a three-day transit strike.
Sand in Contract Gears?
Mr. Toussaint also contends that Mr. Pataki's threat not to approve a key
section of the contract that emerged following the walkout was responsible for
its narrow defeat by his rank and file in January. He also maintains that MTA
Chairman Peter S. Kalikow - a longtime friend and financial backer of the
Governor's - refused to accept the same deal when it was ratified in a re-vote
in April because of Mr. Pataki.
Mr. Spitzer, on the other hand, said at the time that he would have approved
the deal, and has pledged to replace Mr. Kalikow. The contract dispute is
currently in arbitration, but it could ultimately be decided by the new
Governor.