Claims
'Political Hit'
Trial to Begin On Commer's
Ouster
By RICHARD STEIER
The
former president of the Civil Service Technical Guild is seeking reinstatement
of his union membership and $5 million in compensation on the grounds that he
was improperly barred by officials of its parent unions seeking to silence a
critic of their regimes.
 |
| ROY COMMER:
Says candor cost him.
| |
Roy Commer, who
was exiled from the union for failing to reimburse it for more than $11,000 in
unauthorized mailings, will go into U.S. District Court in lower Manhattan Oct.
3 to argue that he was a victim of political retaliation.
Cites DC 37, AFSCME
Named as defendants in the case are past and present officials of the Guild,
District Council 37 - in which the Tech Guild is Local 375 - and its
international union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees. It was the AFSCME Judicial Panel that ordered Mr. Commer's removal
from office in June 2000 and his ban from union membership a year later.
Mr. Commer, who won a bitter election against longtime Tech Guild President
Louis G. Albano in November 1997, only to have to win again in a re-run vote
after the ballots disappeared from a locked room in DC 37's offices before the
tally could be completed for other union positions, claims that his acerbic
criticism of DC 37 and AFSCME prompted a conspiracy to drive him from office. On
Nov. 2, 1998, he alleges in the suit, a majority of the Tech Guild executive
board brought "baseless internal union charges" and suspended him from office
"to prevent him from effectively engaging in [speech critical of those entities]
in the future."
 |
| UMA KUTWAL:
Scandal vindicated Commer.
| |
Clashed Over Fund
While the charges were adjudicated, Mr. Commer's suspension was lifted by
AFSCME President Gerald W. McEntee. Mr. Commer, who had antagonized several Tech
Guild board members by demanding a financial review of its Professional
Employees Legal Services fund, said he continued to be thwarted in his efforts
to have the fund audited. He blamed Mr. Albano, who had continued to be active
in the local's affairs, and Michelle Keller, who was a trustee of the fund.
Ms. Keller responded, "I have no comment."
Mr. Albano, however, said of Mr. Commer, "He's making accusations because he
didn't do the job he should have done."
Under the Tech Guild constitution, Mr. Albano noted in a Sept. 22 phone
interview, "He's required to hold a yearly audit. If he had gone to the board
and done his duty, I don't know how anybody could have stopped him."
In June 1999, the AFSCME Judicial Panel found Mr. Commer guilty of sending
out a mailing regarding Tech Guild delegate elections without the required
authorization of his executive board, and ordered him to reimburse the local for
the $10,000 cost. Seven months later, he was served with a new charge of failing
to get board authorization for a mailing alerting union members to a vote for
the Tech Guild's representative on DC 37's executive board, and the Judicial
Panel eventually ordered that he reimburse the local for that $1,200 cost.
Partial Payment Made?
Mr. Commer has asserted that he wrote a check for $3,800 for part of the
amount he owed, and sought to have the remainder covered by waiving
reimbursement for unused vacation time. Then-Tech Guild Treasurer Bob Mariano
denied having received a check from Mr. Commer, even though another Tech Guild
official, then-Vice President David Grant, said he had been given the check by
Mr. Commer's attorney, Arthur Schwartz.
When Mr. Commer was removed from office, Uma Kutwal, a union vice president
who gained office on his slate but then was a leader in bringing charges against
him, became Tech Guild president. Mr. Kutwal, who lost the next election for the
post to the current incumbent, Claude Fort, has said in an interview that his
view of Mr. Commer was transformed by subsequent revelations of corruption
involving the Tech Guild's longtime bookkeeper, Lloyd Clarke.
Foes Were Negligent
Mr. Clarke last year was criminally convicted of having looted $2.4 million
in union funds, most of it from PELS at the time when Mr. Commer was seeking to
have the legal program audited. The head of that program, as well as Mr.
Mariano, were removed from office shortly after the thefts were discovered in
mid-2004 because they both acknowledged that they had not checked financial
records.
According to Mr. Commer, Mr. McEntee wanted him removed from office because
in April 2000 he had raised questions about a no-bid contract DC 37 had entered
into with a prescription drug provider that employed both Mr. McEntee's daughter
and his ex-wife. He said in an interview last week that Mr. Kutwal is prepared
to testify that Eliot Seide, a ranking AFSCME official whom Mr. McEntee
installed as a deputy administrator of DC 37 following that union's massive 1998
corruption scandal, had called Mr. Commer "a devil [who] must be removed from
the union." Calls to AFSCME and to Mr. Seide were not returned.
Mr. Commer has indicated that if he wins his lawsuit and is reinstated to
union membership, he intends to run for president in the Tech Guild election
scheduled to be held in November.